ryansuydam262010-08-26 12:59:38 +0000 #1
Cole Hamels is probaly having one of the best seasons since his rookie and second year of his career after having probaly the worst last year. his era is around 2.7 but is 4 games under .500 but gets no run support!
1908_Cubs2010-08-26 13:08:10 +0000 #2
Well his ERA is 3.51, so no, it's not really around 2.7. This could easily have been found out using ESPN, CBS or any other baseball statistic website.
That said it's just pure dumb unlucky baseball and that's what wins and losses are a dumb ****ing stat.
More-Then-Most2010-08-26 13:43:02 +0000 #3
2 games in a row the Phillies got robbed. Sigh. **** the umps
sexicano312010-08-26 13:13:48 +0000 #4
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryansuydam26
Cole Hamels is probaly having one of the best seasons since his rookie and second year of his career after having probaly the worst last year. his era is around 2.7 but is 4 games under .500 but gets no run support!
Lol wut?
P.S. can we please not talk about the phillies now?
Dark Donnie2010-08-26 13:18:46 +0000 #5
He's like 0-8 in his last 8 starts with a 2.7 ERA....pretty ******.
Wrench2010-08-26 14:37:53 +0000 #6
Tommy Hanson went on a run of 5 starts with a ERA around 1, and went 0-3. He has a 2.30 ERA in his last 8 starts and is 0-4.
It happens, doesn't need a thread.
Cosmic_Canon2010-08-26 15:18:14 +0000 #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1908_Cubs
That said it's just pure dumb unlucky baseball and that's what wins and losses are a dumb ****ing stat.
This
Going by W-L, Ricky Nolasco is having a awesome year with 14-8 record, while having a 4.22 ERA.
Gigantes4Life2010-08-26 14:05:17 +0000 #8
Because he doesn't know how to win.
Reply
