james212010-07-30 01:34:45 +0000 #1
Wassup knicks fans, bulls fan here! I'm not trying to start an argument, I just wanted to know why you guys are trading chandler? When both are teams were arguing this summer over lebron, you guys main point was chandler, could play the 2 or 3, and he could avg 16ppg next year, he was an up and comming star,a shooter,and much better than deng, If heis all of those things you guys said he is, then just wondering why are you guys looking to move him for chandler?
nykoutlaw3122010-07-30 01:39:05 +0000 #2
That's only for CP3 I wouldn't be suprised if chandler turned better then Galllo
trout16272010-07-30 02:20:33 +0000 #3
Chandler is very popular and skilled. But we are overloaded at the SF position. At the same time, we need to improve the SG position (although some see Chandler as a possible SG). I think that is why a trade is being considered. It's purely a positional need.
Trouble872010-07-30 01:52:35 +0000 #4
If trade value was rated on a scale from 1 to 10
Wilson's trade value would be right around a 5
Many will be able to argue that Wilson's stats are inflated because he's on a D'Antoni team and might suggest his talent is overrated because of the lack of talent on Knick rosters (even the cloudiest diamond could shine in a pile of coal). Those two contributing factors make his value lower than it should be to non-Knick fans.
btw
most true Knick fans don't want Chandler to be traded, he's only put in trade rumors because of his low rookie contract and potential
obcha222010-07-30 02:23:45 +0000 #5
I think Gallo has more room to grow, but Chandler is going to be a beast. I just don't think he is a great 3 point guy. And we need one as our "2". And the Knicks are now full of "3's" so Chandler will be our 2. So if we have a chance to bring in a franchise pg, its a no brainer.
CP and Melo are about the only two I'd want to give up Chandler... or Rose. How bout that, JAmes21, Chandler for Rose, we'll give you back Curry too. LOL
phizics442010-07-30 04:02:39 +0000 #6
Considering the CP3 deal is dead I would chandler and td for IGGY.
What do you guys think?
Trouble872010-07-30 04:19:34 +0000 #7
Quote:
Originally Posted by phizics44
Considering the CP3 deal is dead I would chandler and td for IGGY.
What do you guys think?
Iggy is a good complimentary player but I don't see him as being that much better than Chandler
btw there's a trade idea thread for stuff like this
james212010-07-30 02:17:26 +0000 #8
Quote:
Originally Posted by obcha22
I think Gallo has more room to grow, but Chandler is going to be a beast. I just don't think he is a great 3 point guy. And we need one as our "2". And the Knicks are now full of "3's" so Chandler will be our 2. So if we have a chance to bring in a franchise pg, its a no brainer.
CP and Melo are about the only two I'd want to give up Chandler... or Rose. How bout that, JAmes21, Chandler for Rose, we'll give you back Curry too. LOL
Thanx just wondering cause it seems like chandler is way better than rudy, and I can speak for all bulls fans, saying we would never even consider trading deng, and a 2nd for just fernandez that's crazy!
Reply
