2010-08-24 01:30:22 +0000 #1
The New England Patriots have had 3 very good quarterbacks under Belichick in Bledsoe, Brady, and Cassel. All three had very good statistics under Belichick. However, Bledsoe and Cassel have not had as good seasons afterwords. Even from the Chiefs game on Friday, with Cassel under a successful former NE OC, he plays poorly.
In 2008, Matt Cassel had a 63.4% completion percentage, 3693 yds, 21 TD, 11 INT, and a QB rating of 89.4.
In 09, with the Chiefs, his completion percentage drops to 55%, 2924 yds, 16 TD, 16 INT, QB rating of 69.9, and thats with Pro-Bowl WR Dwayne Bowe too.
So how good is Tom Brady really? How good would Peyton be if he was in NE?
tell me what you think!
EDIT 8.19.10:
What I mean by this is that it is flawed, in a good way. The system is flawed, allowing the QBs to be better than they truly are. The system is amazing, best in football.
And system or not, Tom Brady will be the best QB from the 2000-2009 era. Better than Peyton. Better than Favre. He's got 3 rings to show for it
In 2008, Matt Cassel had a 63.4% completion percentage, 3693 yds, 21 TD, 11 INT, and a QB rating of 89.4.
In 09, with the Chiefs, his completion percentage drops to 55%, 2924 yds, 16 TD, 16 INT, QB rating of 69.9, and thats with Pro-Bowl WR Dwayne Bowe too.
So how good is Tom Brady really? How good would Peyton be if he was in NE?
tell me what you think!
EDIT 8.19.10:
What I mean by this is that it is flawed, in a good way. The system is flawed, allowing the QBs to be better than they truly are. The system is amazing, best in football.
And system or not, Tom Brady will be the best QB from the 2000-2009 era. Better than Peyton. Better than Favre. He's got 3 rings to show for it